<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: The crucial question: Which BI-Tool is able to aggregate this correctly? I say: &#8220;NONE!&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://dwhblog.org/blog/index.php/2006/11/25/the-crucial-question-which-bi-tool-is-able-to-aggregate-this-correctly-i-say-none/</link>
	<description>A Real World Experience</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Von: Frank Backes</title>
		<link>http://dwhblog.org/blog/index.php/2006/11/25/the-crucial-question-which-bi-tool-is-able-to-aggregate-this-correctly-i-say-none/#comment-62452</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 08:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dwhblog.org/blog/index.php/2006/11/25/the-crucial-question-which-bi-tool-is-able-to-aggregate-this-correctly-i-say-none/#comment-62452</guid>
					<description>After some time I'm not sure that MS Analysis Services would do it right.

As far as I understand the &quot;distinct sum&quot;´function, it sums up the DISTINCT VALUES along the hierarchy and not the VALUES OF THE DISTINCT MEMBERS along the hierarchy.

Consider those values please:


        * C1: 7.000
        * C2: 7.000
        * C3: 8.000
        * C4: 4.000

Here are the expected results of the aggregation:

        * R1: 14.000
        * R2: 19.000
        * M1: 26.000

Can MS Analysis Services really calculate the right results?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After some time I&#8217;m not sure that MS Analysis Services would do it right.</p>
<p>As far as I understand the &#8220;distinct sum&#8221;´function, it sums up the DISTINCT VALUES along the hierarchy and not the VALUES OF THE DISTINCT MEMBERS along the hierarchy.</p>
<p>Consider those values please:</p>
<p>        * C1: 7.000<br />
        * C2: 7.000<br />
        * C3: 8.000<br />
        * C4: 4.000</p>
<p>Here are the expected results of the aggregation:</p>
<p>        * R1: 14.000<br />
        * R2: 19.000<br />
        * M1: 26.000</p>
<p>Can MS Analysis Services really calculate the right results?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Cold Warehousing</title>
		<link>http://dwhblog.org/blog/index.php/2006/11/25/the-crucial-question-which-bi-tool-is-able-to-aggregate-this-correctly-i-say-none/#comment-6541</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 04:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dwhblog.org/blog/index.php/2006/11/25/the-crucial-question-which-bi-tool-is-able-to-aggregate-this-correctly-i-say-none/#comment-6541</guid>
					<description>Microsoft Analysis Services 2005 seems to be the best way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft Analysis Services 2005 seems to be the best way to go.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Frank Backes</title>
		<link>http://dwhblog.org/blog/index.php/2006/11/25/the-crucial-question-which-bi-tool-is-able-to-aggregate-this-correctly-i-say-none/#comment-5</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dwhblog.org/blog/index.php/2006/11/25/the-crucial-question-which-bi-tool-is-able-to-aggregate-this-correctly-i-say-none/#comment-5</guid>
					<description>@Andrew and Mosha:

Many thanks for your valuable comments. I appreciate the advice from OLAP gurus like you.

One more question: 

Can Analysis Services manage &quot;distinct sum&quot; with non-leaf members with data? In one hierarchy there can be non-leaf members, which must be aggregated in three different ways:

1) distinct sum over their descendants
2) distinct sum over their descendants and the member itself
3) no aggregation, given value for non-leaf member</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andrew and Mosha:</p>
<p>Many thanks for your valuable comments. I appreciate the advice from OLAP gurus like you.</p>
<p>One more question: </p>
<p>Can Analysis Services manage &#8220;distinct sum&#8221; with non-leaf members with data? In one hierarchy there can be non-leaf members, which must be aggregated in three different ways:</p>
<p>1) distinct sum over their descendants<br />
2) distinct sum over their descendants and the member itself<br />
3) no aggregation, given value for non-leaf member
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Mosha Pasumansky</title>
		<link>http://dwhblog.org/blog/index.php/2006/11/25/the-crucial-question-which-bi-tool-is-able-to-aggregate-this-correctly-i-say-none/#comment-4</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dwhblog.org/blog/index.php/2006/11/25/the-crucial-question-which-bi-tool-is-able-to-aggregate-this-correctly-i-say-none/#comment-4</guid>
					<description>Microsoft Analysis Services 2005 can do this kind of aggregation out of the box. It is called many-to-many dimensions. It allows you to compute distinct sum (similar to distinct count) - which is exactly what you need here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft Analysis Services 2005 can do this kind of aggregation out of the box. It is called many-to-many dimensions. It allows you to compute distinct sum (similar to distinct count) - which is exactly what you need here.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Andrew Wiles</title>
		<link>http://dwhblog.org/blog/index.php/2006/11/25/the-crucial-question-which-bi-tool-is-able-to-aggregate-this-correctly-i-say-none/#comment-3</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dwhblog.org/blog/index.php/2006/11/25/the-crucial-question-which-bi-tool-is-able-to-aggregate-this-correctly-i-say-none/#comment-3</guid>
					<description>SAS Institutes CFO Vision was able to do this. I was the development manager for this product and we had to deliver exaclty this scenario for a large US customer.

I am not sure if the current product SAS/FM has continued this functionality but I can give you a contact in the Eurpoean HQ if you would like to find out.

It is not too difficult to implement this kind of logic in Analysis Services but it does require a bit of creative thinking.

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SAS Institutes CFO Vision was able to do this. I was the development manager for this product and we had to deliver exaclty this scenario for a large US customer.</p>
<p>I am not sure if the current product SAS/FM has continued this functionality but I can give you a contact in the Eurpoean HQ if you would like to find out.</p>
<p>It is not too difficult to implement this kind of logic in Analysis Services but it does require a bit of creative thinking.</p>
<p>Regards
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
